Why Open MCP Gateway?
As AI applications increasingly rely on MCP servers for tool access and data integration, the need for robust infrastructure becomes critical. Open MCP Gateway addresses real-world challenges that teams face when scaling MCP deployments.
The Challenges You Face
1. Connection Management Complexity
Without a Gateway: Every AI client must:
- Know how to connect to each MCP server
- Handle different connection protocols
- Manage connection pooling and retries
- Deal with server discovery
With Open MCP Gateway:
- Single endpoint for all MCP servers
- Gateway handles connection management
- Automatic retries and health checks
- Centralized server discovery via catalog
2. Resource Inefficiency
Without a Gateway:
- MCP servers run continuously, consuming resources
- No automatic cleanup of idle servers
- Manual process management required
- Each developer manages their own server instances
With Open MCP Gateway:
- Servers start on-demand when first request arrives
- Automatic shutdown after configurable idle period (default: 5 minutes)
- Centralized lifecycle management
- Shared server instances across clients
3. Configuration Fragmentation
Without a Gateway:
- Each client has its own server configuration
- Changes require updating multiple places
- No single source of truth
- Version drift between environments
With Open MCP Gateway:
- Single YAML catalog defines all servers
- Hot reload without restarts
- Git-friendly configuration
- Consistent across all clients
4. Platform Lock-in
Existing Solutions:
- Docker-only gateways (Docker MCP Gateway)
- Vendor-specific orchestration (IBM ContextForge)
- No unified multi-runtime solution
Open MCP Gateway:
- Vendor-neutral runtime abstraction
- Local processes for development
- Remote HTTP for cloud services
- Docker and Kubernetes for production
- Same configuration works everywhere
Unique Selling Points
🦀 Rust-Native Performance
Built entirely in Rust, Open MCP Gateway delivers:
| Metric | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Memory Safety | No garbage collection pauses, no null pointer crashes |
| Low Overhead | ~5MB base memory footprint |
| High Concurrency | Tokio async runtime handles thousands of connections |
| Fast Startup | Cold start in milliseconds |
| Small Image | Docker image under 50MB |
🔄 True Hot Reload
Unlike solutions that require restart for config changes:
# Edit your catalog
vim catalog.yaml
# Gateway detects changes automatically
# New servers available immediately
# Existing connections unaffected
The file watcher uses debounced reloads (500ms) to handle rapid saves, and atomic registry swaps ensure zero-downtime updates.
🎯 Auto-Managed Lifecycle
The gateway manages the complete server lifecycle:
Request arrives → Server not running?
↓
Start server automatically
↓
Process request
↓
Track last activity
↓
Idle timeout reached?
↓
Graceful shutdown
This means:
- Zero manual intervention for routine operations
- Automatic resource recovery from idle servers
- Self-healing when servers crash
- Metrics and status for every server
🌐 Dual Transport Architecture
Serve both web and desktop clients from the same gateway:
HTTP/SSE Transport (gateway-http):
# Modern REST API
POST /mcp {"server_id": "postgres", "method": "tools/call", ...}
# Server management
GET /servers
POST /servers/postgres/start
Stdio Transport (gateway-stdio):
// Claude Desktop config
{
"mcpServers": {
"gateway": {
"command": "gateway-stdio",
"args": ["--server", "postgres"]
}
}
}
🔌 Universal Runtime Support
One gateway, any deployment model:
| Runtime | Use Case | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Local Process | Development, testing | ✅ Available |
| Remote SSE | Cloud MCP services | ✅ Available |
| Docker | Containerized deployment | 🚧 v0.2 |
| Kubernetes Job | Ephemeral workloads | 🚧 v0.3 |
| Kubernetes Service | Long-running servers | 🚧 v0.3 |
Comparison with Alternatives
vs. Direct MCP Connections
| Aspect | Direct | With Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Setup complexity | Each client configured separately | Single catalog, multiple clients |
| Resource usage | All servers always running | On-demand lifecycle |
| Configuration changes | Update every client | Update one file, hot reload |
| Monitoring | DIY per server | Centralized stats endpoint |
vs. Docker MCP Gateway
| Aspect | Docker Gateway | Open MCP Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime support | Docker only | Process, HTTP, Docker, K8s |
| Language | Varies | Rust (memory safe, fast) |
| Stdio support | Limited | First-class |
| Hot reload | No | Yes |
vs. IBM ContextForge
| Aspect | ContextForge | Open MCP Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Target | Enterprise IBM ecosystem | Any environment |
| Complexity | Full platform | Minimal core |
| Open source | No | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hosted | Limited | Full control |
When to Use Open MCP Gateway
Ideal For:
✅ Development teams managing multiple MCP servers ✅ Production deployments requiring lifecycle automation ✅ Mixed environments (local + cloud + containers) ✅ Claude Desktop/Cline users wanting centralized config ✅ Kubernetes deployments (with v0.3 runtimes) ✅ Resource-conscious environments needing idle cleanup
May Not Need If:
- Single MCP server with one client
- Already using a platform with built-in MCP orchestration
- Need multi-tenant isolation immediately (coming in v0.3)
Real-World Scenarios
Scenario 1: Development Team
"We have 5 developers, each running 3 MCP servers locally. Configuration was scattered across everyone's machines."
Solution: Central gateway with shared catalog in Git. Each developer points Claude Desktop to the gateway. Configuration changes go through PR review.
Scenario 2: Production API
"Our AI service needs to access 10 different MCP tools, but we can't afford to run all servers 24/7."
Solution: Gateway with 5-minute idle timeout. Servers spin up on first request, shut down when idle. 80% reduction in compute costs.
Scenario 3: Multi-Cloud Deployment
"Some MCP servers run locally, some in our cloud, some are SaaS endpoints."
Solution: Mixed runtime catalog:
servers:
- id: local-db
runtime:
type: local-process
command: db-mcp
- id: cloud-api
runtime:
type: remote-sse
url: https://mcp.internal.company.com/api
- id: saas-tool
runtime:
type: remote-sse
url: https://mcp.vendor.com/tool
Getting Started
Ready to simplify your MCP infrastructure?
Join the community on GitHub and help shape the future of MCP orchestration.